Date: 2016-04-19 07:49 am (UTC)
You are both likely familiar with my model (which is different and pretty much excludes spiritual-materialistic concepts): http://politicalobjectivestest.blogspot.com.au/2007/04/findings-of-test.html

I attempted to crush the numbers once my survey participants exceeded 100 and one of the conclusions (that a friend drew on looking at them) was that the vast majority of takers got results that could allow me to dismiss multi-dimensional models. It could go "socialist > liberal > conservative" if I wanted and very few would mind.

But I'm interested in minority perspectives and think that they matter and can potentially make a difference. A member of our choir has qualms about both free-markets and libertine mores and I would prefer if a model recognizes his existence (even if the poor fellow will never get much satisfaction from electoral politics).

I have another problem with left-and-right beyond lack of inclusiveness and that is that it is a description that changes reality. Many get introduced to it and then think "well if I believe x then I must also believe y" or even "if _they_ believe x and y then I must not believe in x and y".
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

motg: (Default)
motg

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
23 45678
910 1112131415
161718 19202122
23242526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 11:15 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios